The U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear the copyright case of AI works, upholding the legal principle of "human creation" The U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear the appeal of computer scientist Stephen Thaler on March 2, upholding the ruling that AI-generated works are not protected by copyright

The U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear the copyright case of AI works, upholding the legal principle of "human creation" The U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear the appeal of computer scientist Stephen Thaler on March 2, upholding the ruling that AI-generated works are not protected by copyright. Previously, the U.S. Copyright Office and lower courts held that under current law, copyright-protected creations must have the core element of "human authorship." The case involves visual artwork that Thaler independently created using his AI system DABUS. This ruling means that in the context of the rapid development of generative AI, the judiciary has temporarily clarified its position that non-human creations cannot obtain legal protection. Reuters 🍀 In Flower Channel…